A Los Angeles Delivery driver has won a lawsuit against demand against Starbucks After a spill on one of the company’s California locations, he was severely burned. A Los Angeles County Jury ruled on Friday in favor, ordering Starbucks paying $ 50 million to Michael Garcia, People informed
How was Michael Garcia injured in Los Angeles Starbucks in 2020?
Garcia said in his demand that he was collecting drinks in a Los Angeles Starbucks in 2020 when he was burned by barista’s negligence, according to the Associated press. According to the demand, the barista failed to secure one of the tapas when he placed the drinks on the carrier. Garcia said that the drink was spilled shortly after he took it from the employee.
What kind of injuries did Michael Garcia suffer after burning -SE on Starbucks?
Garcia said he suffered third degree burns that caused serious injuries to his genitals. His lawyer, Nick Rowley, stated that his client is now experiencing pain during privacy.
“One of the most pleasant experiences of life has been changed by pain,” Rowley said in a statement according to people.
The lawyer added that Garcia is a “different person” due to this injury and that “this will affect all the facets of his life”.
According to Associated Press, Rowley said that the verdict “is a critical step in making Starbucks responsible for blatant client safety and non -acceptance of responsibility.”
What did Starbucks say about the jury’s decision to grant $ 50 million to Michael Garcia?
Starbucks Corporate Communication Director Jaci Anderson Los Angeles Times That the company does not agree with the court’s decision.
“We sympathize with Mr. Garcia, but we do not agree with the jury’s decision that we were to blame for this incident and we believe that the damage that was granted is excessive,” Anderson told The Outlet. “We have always committed to the highest safety standards in our stores, including the handling of hot drinks.”
How much did Michael Garcia originally requested in his demand?
Garcia initially sought $ 120 million in damage while Starbucks offered to solve the case for $ 3 million. Garcia agreed to accept the offer in three conditions, one of which was for Starbucks to change their store policy and issue a note reminding employees to check hot drinks before giving them to customers. Starbucks rejected the application and the case proceeded to court.
Rowley said the court ruling is a vital step towards justice, but Garcia still has significant problems.
“No amount of money can undo the permanent and catastrophic damage he has suffered,” said the lawyer. “But this jury’s verdict is a critical step for Starbucks responsible for blatant client safety disregard and lack of acceptance of responsibility.”
