Five expelled won a key struggle President Donald Trump in his Federal Court in their defamation case.
US Judge Wendy Betlest ruling The statement of the President’s discussion on September 10, 2024, and the president’s discussion may be interpreted as factual candidates, not opinions, making them defamation requirements.
“Broadcasting has been responsible for his defamatory publication,” he said. “The plaintiffs here were not only in the process of being expelled. Their name was cleared more than twenty years, so the defendant cannot claim that it is not to blame for those crimes.
During the debate, the candidate Trump falsely stated that Anoton Mkrre, Kevin Richardson, Yuseplan, Raymond Santana, and Korain Wise, “killed in 2002.learned from all accusations After confessing the crime, another individual, and DNA confirmed evidence of their innocence.
Mkrrey, Richardson, Salam, Santana and the wise have filed a lawsuit in October 2024, looking for losses for describing as “authority and emotional damage.” Their lawsuit claims that Trump’s statements broadcast on the audience of 67 million viewers, enriched a false story about their work.
While Trump Lawyers argue his comments The word is protected According to the first change, Judge Bekleson decided that as the statements could be rigged with existing records, they are not protected by constitutional protection. Trump’s legal team has rejected allegations.
“This unfounded lawsuit is another unfounded and impassable attack against President Trump,” Karin Swigyegart, the trumpet said.
The Chen’s spectrum, the main lawyer for five, welcomed the judge’s decision and said he was preparing for trial.
“We expect to identify, trial and the final justification of these five good men,” said the specnop.
Related Content: iPhones vs. Trump Tariffs. Financial strategies share everything that matters the most
