The ruler represents another turn of the legitimate landscape after the decisions of 2023 of the Supreme Court, which declares the established action unconstitutional.
In 2020, Donald Trump Juda Arbu decided that IBM would demand to protect racial discrimination on racial discrimination to build more diverse jobs by a white man.
According to Reuters, Jar Arbu ruled that dill demands if true, IBM requires protecting itself From the claims that the company sets special targets for the company’s racial and gender makeup, as well as offered financial incentives for dill.
“It is taken as true, dill accusations that are fundamentally supported by the IBM inappropriately categorically considered racial or gender factor,” Jarbou wrote in its decision.
Dill is represented by the United States first legal, which was founded by Stepan Miller, the Higher Trump Consultant, which stimulated white nationalist views.
The company tends to focus on the cases that contain arguments that DEI initiatives distinguish between white people.
Sill claims that he has been placed in the implementation plan, despite the previous positive response, and the plan, he claims to be completed in 2023.
He also insisted that IBM had race and sexual quotas that guide hired and promotion bonuses on the basis of the goals, which he claims to push them to push people from white.
IBM, however, countered dill’s demands, saying that they do not use any kind of quotas and storage that dill demands were unfounded and exaggerated to recognize alleged preferential treatment.
According to Jarbou, there is a potential connection between the alleged stimulation program and fennel shots.
“At this stage, dill provided enough facts to viable race and gender discrimination against IBM,” Arbu wrote.
Although his ruling Arbu admitted that the legal priority stipulates that the plaintiffs should show the lawsuit against employment discrimination, they have unfavorable class. Decided that dill has filed enough facts to move forward with his caseA number
The ruler poses another turn of the 2023 of the Supreme Court, declaring positive action unconstitutional, which has led to a positive action arguments that are trying other laws that originally created to protect black Americans from discrimination In the comments that work in the workplace in favor of suspicious discrimination in white Americans.
According to the Executive Director of Melder Glasu, David Glasu, David Glasse, David Glasu, David Glycer, David Glycer, Both Legal), as well as many cases, have put many cases in the “Supreme Court.” The Guardian: In 2024. ” They realize that it is 6-3 conservative supermarket supreme court, but they don’t know how long they are going to have this truly friendly conservative court. “
Related Content:: The fearless fund has been closed in the settlement. Conservatives declare victory, black women’s business owners get shaft
